Archive for June 2010

The Month that Was: June

The Month That Was is a regular feature on Through the Looking Glass. On the last day of each month, it will take a look back at the month that was and the highlights (and lowlights) from it.

Some sobering thoughts after the G20

As per Guy’s suggestion, I have decided to revisit my thoughts about the G20 after the dust settled (and the rain cleared).

Monday may have marked the beginning of a new week, but Torontonians were not letting the events of the weekend go — another protest began at police headquarters, marched across College St. to University, down to Queen and over to city hall.

Apparently, the group was protesting the treatment of police Sunday night when a whole bunch of people (including those just in the neighbourhood and journalists) were held at Queen and Spadina Sts. and threatened with arrest. They were let go after nearly five hours of standing on the street surrounded by police.

And if Twitter is an indication, it was also a way for people to shame Toronto Mayor David Miller (who likely would totally have been at his City Hall office at 8 o’clock at night) for praising the work done by the police over the weekend and not asking questions.

Here’s what I wonder: All of these people joining groups on Facebook calling for inquiries to the way security was handled during the G20 or saying Miller should step up and all of those on Twitter making sure to use Miller’s account in their tweet in the hopes he sees the anger, how many of them actually voted in the last municipal election? The last federal election.

A giant protest outside of city hall and police headquarters in not necessarily the way to get your message across (I went to York University, where people protest about protests). Exercising your democratic right by voting is the sure way to enact change (that and there is the Toronto police services board for complaints — Miller made that abundantly clear to Torontonians in his press conference Monday morning).

In fact, if you look at all the peaceful protests on Saturday: The ones for women’s reproductive rights around the world, climate change, poverty, etc. etc., voting for someone who shares your viewpoint on all of these things is one of the easiest ways to try and get action on them.

What I fear from the vast majority of the current angry mob is that they haven’t voted, or don’t vote, for the old fear the guy they want will never get elected, anyway. I understand that adage — it’s one I subscribe to myself. But it shouldn’t be. After all, voting for who you think is going to win, or not voting because you feel your vote is worthless, is not democracy in action.

I would hedge my bets that even if Miller was running again, he would not condemn the police service. From what I’ve heard, it wasn’t Toronto Police that held all those people at Queen and Spadina. He can’t tell the cops how to do their job, that is not his job as mayor. A politician who tells the police what to do and how to act is not what we want to happen in Canada, because that could lead to a loss of democracy and freedom.

As for the cries on Sunday night demanding our dear old Mayor make an appearance, he was detained at other engagements — and then a city emergency when Union Station began to flood because of the rain. No doubt if he had ignored that to deal with Queen and Spadina, a whole different group of citizens would be yelling shame, shame at him when the station was closed Monday morning.

Should an independent inquiry be held about the police actions over the weekend? Yes. Should Miller be the one to demand it? No. This was not his meeting. It was not his decision to hold it in Toronto — or to close off downtown for days by building a fence. Miller is not the enemy in all of this (neither, really, is Stephen Harper).

Demand an inquiry by writing letters to politicians who can make that happen. File a complaint with the police services board if you were treated badly. Exercise your right this fall to vote for a city council you feel you can trust, you align with your beliefs.

If you really must blame Miller, then at least take it off social networking and into the real world by real action. A tweet can never replace action.

An ode to the G20

As I write this, I can hear the helicopters circling in the sky. In the distance, you can make out the sound of sirens. And at one point, I could hear the chanting.

This is not my city.

The last few days it hasn’t felt like the Toronto I know and love, where I’ve made my home. The security fence went up, and the city I know disappeared.

This is not my city.

I may live in Toronto, but for this weekend, I feel like I’m visiting somewhere else. The amount of police is jarring and almost scary. Being stopped for motorcades has become the norm. Stores in my neighbourhood have closed for the weekend, even boarding up their windows in the hopes that their businesses will still be standing upon their return Monday morning.

This is not my city.

I understand why we have the increased police presence. I understand the reason for the fence, for the hundreds — maybe thousands of police officers from other jurisdictions. I understand why stores have shut their business this weekend, why we are getting road and transit closures with no notice. But it doesn’t make any of it any easier to swallow.

This is not my city.

I don’t side with the protesters, but I don’t side with the cops either. A big part of me thinks if the protesters didn’t protest, then we wouldn’t have needed the fence, the police, what everyone seems to be so up in arms about. The protesters claim police brutality, while the police claim they are just doing their jobs. Who to believe?

This is not my city.

I was supposed to be at the Rogers Centre Friday night, welcoming back Roy Halladay. Instead, he and the Phillies demolished the Blue Jays in Philadelphia as I watched on television. I wanted to go watch the World Cup at a great bar this morning for the experience. Instead, we watched it in our home. I wanted to enjoy my long weekend, instead I’m stuck watching riot coverage on television.

This is not my city.

I wonder what the fallout will be after all of this. Will I ever go back to loving the Toronto I knew before this weekend? Or will the reports to come forever taint how I feel about my city, my politicians, my fellow Torontonians?

I want my city back.

Footnote: Just as I finished writing this post, the protesters have begun to destroy property. Thus far, a cop car has been destroyed, the Starbucks at Queen and John was destroyed (and none of the patrons were allowed to leave before the protesters broke windows), banks, media vans, and so much more. This is ridiculous and I am a little scared.

Why Miley Cyrus can’t just grow up

Typically when a singer releases a new album, they generate a whole bunch of headlines. For Miley Cyrus, the headlines have barely been about her upcoming album, Can’t Be Tamed.

First there was that whole Miley kissed a girl thing (no word on whether she liked it) while performing on Britain’s Got Talent (does anyone else wonder why a talent show has guest performers?).

Then there was the video for the Can’t be Tamed single — pole dancing, writhing backup dancers, etc., etc.

Then there was the whole Perez Hilton thing from last week, where the blogger posted a photo of Miley getting out of a car in a short dress, apparently without any underwear on (remind you of anyone?). Hilton later recanted, posting a photo that showed Miley was wearing some kind of underwear.

Miley brushes off all the criticism, telling Reuters:

I’m just at a certain place where I’ve changed a lot as a person. I’ve grown up a lot, which everyone does.

Yes, Miley, everyone does grow up. But few have to do it in the spotlight, trying to navigate the murky waters from adorable child star to well-adjusted adult. Miley Cyrus faces a bit more of a struggle in her quest, though.

Why is Miley Cyrus seemingly under more scrutiny than the child stars before her? All you have to do is listen to her speak, and you see she’s still more of a girl, less of a woman.

Here’s Miley on David Letterman this year:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTtpOX7hbcg

Contrast that with Britney Spears at the same age:

Or Christina Aguleria just a few years older:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t403rPqkHIE

Basically, it all comes down to semantics. Britney and Christina were allowed to grow up and become sexual beings much easier than Miley is because Britney and Christina always presented themselves as adults — or at least older than their years. (Yes, Britney got a lot of press about whether she was being sexualized too young, but she was the first, so the press is to be expected).

Miley, however, still talks like the teenager she is — she talks super fast, with lots of “uhs” and “likes” sandwiched inbetween. And there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. After all, she is a 17-year-old girl, she should be allowed to talk like one.

It’s not her southern accent either, Britney was from the south, too and still managed to come across as polished and presentable. Miley on the other hand, sounds bored in her interviews, not at all polished or presentable at times (just look at her reaction to the smoking baby clip with Letterman, she squeals: “That’s not real!” That’s not very grown up).

If Miley really wants to grow up and shed her Hannah Montana image, then she needs to truly grow up and get a new image — and that doesn’t mean she just needs to be more sexualized. Miley needs to present herself like the adult she wants to be in every way: In interviews, online (especially her blog), at awards shows (the MMVAs anyone?) and in her music.

Until she does, she will still be everyone’s little girl.

And every adult step she tries to take will be criticized.

Implications of Waterloo’s steroids scandal

On Monday, news broke everywhere that the University of Waterloo’s football team was sitting out the 2010 season after players tested positive for steroids.

I’m not going to rehash the entire story here (the links above fill you in nicely), but there’s one thing that I haven’t seen in the coverage yet.

The impact of this scandal is huge — for players at Waterloo, players at other CIS teams, the schools, the students, the administration and the general public.

However, what I feel could be most damaging from this report is how it looks on CIS football to the general public who doesn’t really care about university football — sorry, Canadian university football.

Most university athletics in Canada take a back seat. Unless you know someone on a team, or went to a school that performed well (for football in Ontario that would be Ottawa, Queen’s, Western), then you likely could care less about university athletics.

I know because I worked with the York University football team for a year when I went to university. York’s team is lacklustre to say the least (they are almost at two years straight without a win). And that is what they are known for.

As was the case in 2008 when U of T broke the losing streak (set by York), losing their 49h game. It is times like that when university sports makes news (and yes, I am guilty of that too).

It’s not right, but it’s the climate in Canada. My fear with this steroids scandal is it will send more of the general public away from supporting these teams, and send even more Canadian kids with real talent and promise to colleges in the States.

Yes, we need to be asking ourselves if the steroids problem is more widespread, or in other programs at other schools. But we also need to support our athletes who are clean, because there’s a pile of players at Waterloo who lost their season yesterday to no fault of their own.

For some great commentary on the suspensions, read Bruce Arthur’s column from the National Post here, and a great post from Out of Left Field here.