Bristol Palin and Levi Johnston are off again.
Don’t worry if you didn’t even know the two were on again — they got back together and split up faster than Ross or Rachel have on Friends.
I once thought it was impossible to make the story of a knocked up 17-year-old girl whose mother was running for vice-president of the United States for the Republican Party any sadder, but apparently there is. It’s the saga that is Levi and Bristol.
In 2008 when her pregnancy came out, I felt sad for poor Bristol. Sad that she had to suffer the weight of being pregnant before marriage in the public eye. Sad that she would never be able to raise that baby in peace — the press would hound her for years. And even sadder that now she was to marry the boy who knocked her up (after all, the marriage likely wasn’t because she wanted to, as much as she needed to accept the marriage as punishment for what she did).
But then Levi went all fame hungry, and Bristol played the teen single mom card. A few weeks ago, I read an interview with her in People magazine where she talked about how being a mom was, you know, like, hard, which made me find it hard to believe that Levi was the only one hungry for fame.

Really Bristol, you can go away now.
After all, Sarah Palin did not win the election and she resigned as governor of Alaska, so really there is no need for her daughter to still be making headlines by giving interviews. There is no need for Bristol to do an anti-teen pregnancy PSA. Or to be guesting on The Secret Life of the American Teenager (warning extremely BAD acting on that link — click on your own peril). Or charging at least $15,000 for public speaking engagement — I’m sorry what wisdom does Bristol possess that I would want, or need, to spend tens of thousands of dollars to hear?
Once upon a time, I felt bad for Bristol Palin. But not anymore. She may have been thrust into the media spotlight at a time when most teenage girls would rather not face the world, but now she demands it.
When her and Levi got re-engaged, the couple spilled all the deets to US Weekly (for the low price tag of $10,000 — I can’t imagine why anyone would think it was just a publicity stunt):
“I really thought we were over,” Levi tells Us Weekly. “So when I went, I had no hope. I think we both just started talking — and then we took Tripp for a walk.”
Says Bristol, “When he left that night, we didn’t hug or kiss, but I was thinking how different it was. He texted me: ‘I miss you. I love you. I want to be with you again’ … I was in shock.”
Gag.
And then this week, who gets the “exclusive” it’s over deets? People magazine, come on down:
And just like that, they were off again. “It’s over. I broke up with him,” Bristol Palin tells PEOPLE exclusively of her second try at an engagement to Levi Johnston, father of her 19-month-old son Tripp.
Palin, 19, says the relationship soured on July 14, the very same day they announced their marriage intentions to the world. Palin says he told her that evening he might have fathered a baby with another teenage girl.
This is worse than Days of our Lives.
The only person I feel sorry for in this whole charade is Baby Tripp who did nothing to deserve any of this. It would be one thing if Bristol and Levi were fighting over their son, but instead it appears the two of them are trying to outdo one another on extending their 15 minutes of fame.
Give me a break.
What we all should do is ignore all the forthcoming “news” from Bristol Palin and Levon Johnston. If you wouldn’t care about the intimate workings of the teenage couple down the street, then please, don’t care about these two. Don’t feed into their need to be famous.
Because there’s a baby involved in all of this. And one would hope he will grow up to be a wonderful person.
Even if his parents are limelight-loving, money-grabbing, publicity-seekers.
(Photo of Bristol Palin from chrisdat on Flickr. Check out more photos in chrisdat’s photostream).
What happened to the “real news?”
As I sat down to watch the 6 p.m. news Tuesday night, I was happy to be away from the Internet for awhile.
Away from Steven Slater. Away from Dry Erase Girl. Away from Chicken McNugget Freakout.
So imagine my horror when Steven Slater was promoed in the introduction to the newscast — a local newscast. And how was it promoed? They sent a reporter around retelling the story to people to get their reactions.
You’ve got to be kidding me (oh and for good measure, Chicken McNugget Freakout was in their “world” news).
I know television news is having trouble staying afloat during the recession — after all, advertising is down for them, too. But this made me shake my head. I only felt a little bit worse when I saw on Twitter that both these stories were also on my national newscast.
The biggest problem I have with this is why stuff like this is taking up valuable airtime and taking time away from an actual story. My local newsman could have been out trolling the streets for a real story (after all that Rob Ford parody site was shut down on Tuesday, perhaps that could have been looked into or what about the Hamilton Tiger-Cats threatening to leave Hamilton and the city council vote that could push them out the door that was going on?).
I watch my local news to see what is going on in my city. Not to watch people in my city describe what someone else did in another city the day before!
Perhaps that’s what really irks me about the situation: Slater’s tantrum happened on Monday. Unlike newspapers, TV news comes out the same day events happen (that’s their “advantage”). So why is local news still talking about it? Mention Slater got bail, but don’t send one of your few reporters around the city retelling the tale.
Newspapers may not know how to work the Internet into their business model, but TV news is even worse. They tend to play videos that are a hit online just because (a few weeks ago I saw a goal celebration video on the news that I had already seen on the Internet the week before).
It’s about repackaging content. And perhaps I am just too tuned into the online world and the real world to fall for such shenanigans, but it get shameful when “stories” like these two take up valuable airtime from other newsier items of the day.
Thank god Dry Erase Girl is a hoax, maybe that means I won’t be seeing her on tonight’s 6 p.m. newscast. Or perhaps it means I will.