The cover of Eye Weekly caught my eye Saturday.
I was on my way to the Molson Canadian Amphitheatre for Lilith Fair 2010 when Eye called to me.
“Do we need a Lilith Fair in 2010?” The cover asked.
When I arrived at the Amphitheatre, the answer hit my like a tonne of bricks as I glanced at the women — the thousands of women — around me. Yes.
The article made all the points one would expect an article like it to make
- Lilith Fair is, like, so 1999.
- We have successful solo women’s artists now (see Gaga, Lady).
- Um, no one cares about girls with guitars anymore.
- Lacklustre ticket sales prove all the above.
Some highlights from the article:
In this epoch, where widely circulating upskirt photos of an underage Miley Cyrus are only a minor scandal, it’s difficult to communicate what Lilith meant back then. The 1990s featured a remarkable dissonance between the mainstreaming of underground, girl-made rock and big-money pop. It was when riot grrrl begat “girl power,” and representations of women were available in reclaimed foxcore slut codes (Bikini Kill, Bratmobile, Hole), jeans-and-tees alt-rock (the Breeders, Sleater-Kinney, Veruca Salt, Liz Phair), WTF pop-rock (Gwen Stefani, notably) and schoolgirl-era Britney Spears. In the many years since, but especially in the past decade, the multitude of ways for women to exist as artists and project their artist-images have largely disappeared — nobody would get away with cords and no makeup on MTV anymore — creating a cottage industry of 1990s girl-culture nostalgia.
And then it’s ultimate conclusion on why Lilith Fair is a waste of time 10 years later:
So, no. We don’t need Lilith Fair, at least not as an awkward stand-in for a giant social problem that’s resolvable only by a shift in cultural attitudes and behaviours. And Lilith, the one that exists in reality rather than as an ideal, doesn’t need the critical hurricane it’s in the middle of because it fails to do the impossible, or because it’s just a standard, for-profit tour with a marketing strategy that uses sisterhood to sell singers in the same way Warped Tour uses punk’s legacy to sell shoes. As a platform for artists, and as a catalyst for discussion, sure, Lilith is a valid project. But, on its own, it’s just a show.
A few observations about whether we still “need” a Lilith in 2010 that came to me while at the concert Saturday night.
What is being forgotten in this Eye Magazine article is as Lilith was going on in the ’90s, the Spice Girls were dominating the charts — so there were successful women acts on the pop charts. Alanis was never part of any Lilith lineup, that I can tell.
Lilith seemed to be then, and is now, a collection of smart women who write their own music and play an instrument. The Eye article points out the Lights recently “released an acoustic EP that is more Lilith-appropriate than her usual electronics-heavy pop-rock” — yet she only played one tune from that EP. The rest of her set Saturday in Toronto was the music she has created and become a success with.
I’ve been to many concerts over the year, but I have never, ever seen so many women in one place (I’m going to put my odds at 20 women for every one man). It actually brought tears to my eyes at times. Yes, we have Lady Gaga and all these other women who are doing things their way with a lot of success, but Gaga is no girl with a guitar. When she sits at her piano and plays Speechless live — that’s when she’s a Lilith Girl.
McLachlan says Lilith is socially conscious like no other act out there, and that is true. But I don’t think it’s charitable contributions set it apart. Lilith is a place where you and your best friend can sit for the day and chill out to the tunes that you listened to as a teenager — that’s what Lilith means to me. Eye makes it seem like it’s only soccer moms that would go to Lilith — but they’re forgetting that when McLachlan made it huge back in 1997/98 a lot of us were teenagers experiencing that record for the first time. Making memories to that record.
The same goes for Chantal Kreviazuk. She is a socially conscious artist, always has been. She is a voice of War Child. It hit me as Kreviazuk played away Saturday that she was just on the cusp of making it huge during the last Lilith bout. Colour, Moving and Still came out in 1999 — and that blew her wide open.
Most of all, we still need Lilith because it’s still looked at as a “lesbian festival” — which is rude and disrespectful not just to women, but to lesbians, too. The stereotypes that Lilith Fair was trying to kill in 1999 still exist today. I was amazed at the amount of tweets I saw on Saturday talking about how all the lesbians were getting rained on at Lilith Fair. A male-orientated festival would never be consider homosexual at all — they’re actually looked at as the most masculine events a guy could go to.
But the biggest reason we need Lilith in 2010 is not to change what other think of us as women, but what we think of each other as women. More often than not, it’s not the men in our lives that cut us down — we cut one another down. Whether it be at work or between friends, women cut one another so short it makes me sad. I do it too, but that doesn’t make it right.
And for a brief moment at Lilith Fair on Saturday night as the crowd swayed on its feet singing along to Angel with Sarah McLachlan on stage, I felt like I was a part of something bigger than myself. I felt, for one brief moment, that other women were not my competitors, not out to get my job or my man — they were my allies.
And there is no where else I would have wanted to be at that moment.
That is why we need Lilith Fair in 2010.
Photos courtesy of jennyrotten on Flickr. You can see more of her work here.


Why Miley Cyrus can’t just grow up
Typically when a singer releases a new album, they generate a whole bunch of headlines. For Miley Cyrus, the headlines have barely been about her upcoming album, Can’t Be Tamed.
First there was that whole Miley kissed a girl thing (no word on whether she liked it) while performing on Britain’s Got Talent (does anyone else wonder why a talent show has guest performers?).
Then there was the video for the Can’t be Tamed single — pole dancing, writhing backup dancers, etc., etc.
Then there was the whole Perez Hilton thing from last week, where the blogger posted a photo of Miley getting out of a car in a short dress, apparently without any underwear on (remind you of anyone?). Hilton later recanted, posting a photo that showed Miley was wearing some kind of underwear.
Miley brushes off all the criticism, telling Reuters:
Yes, Miley, everyone does grow up. But few have to do it in the spotlight, trying to navigate the murky waters from adorable child star to well-adjusted adult. Miley Cyrus faces a bit more of a struggle in her quest, though.
Why is Miley Cyrus seemingly under more scrutiny than the child stars before her? All you have to do is listen to her speak, and you see she’s still more of a girl, less of a woman.
Here’s Miley on David Letterman this year:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTtpOX7hbcg
Contrast that with Britney Spears at the same age:
Or Christina Aguleria just a few years older:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t403rPqkHIE
Basically, it all comes down to semantics. Britney and Christina were allowed to grow up and become sexual beings much easier than Miley is because Britney and Christina always presented themselves as adults — or at least older than their years. (Yes, Britney got a lot of press about whether she was being sexualized too young, but she was the first, so the press is to be expected).
Miley, however, still talks like the teenager she is — she talks super fast, with lots of “uhs” and “likes” sandwiched inbetween. And there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. After all, she is a 17-year-old girl, she should be allowed to talk like one.
It’s not her southern accent either, Britney was from the south, too and still managed to come across as polished and presentable. Miley on the other hand, sounds bored in her interviews, not at all polished or presentable at times (just look at her reaction to the smoking baby clip with Letterman, she squeals: “That’s not real!” That’s not very grown up).
If Miley really wants to grow up and shed her Hannah Montana image, then she needs to truly grow up and get a new image — and that doesn’t mean she just needs to be more sexualized. Miley needs to present herself like the adult she wants to be in every way: In interviews, online (especially her blog), at awards shows (the MMVAs anyone?) and in her music.
Until she does, she will still be everyone’s little girl.
And every adult step she tries to take will be criticized.